I would love to hear from fellow nudists what they feel about the fully exposed glans of the male penis when going nude.
I was circumcised at the age of 30, purely for sexual reasons, and I absolutely LOVE being circumcised for the last 20 years now!
What do the women think when they walk past and see a male with a circumcised penis? I am particularly interested in the womens view points. Did you have your boys circumcised? If so, was it for aesthetic/sexual reasons too, or just the normal health/cleanliness reasons?

yes, a circumcised cock has coronal ridge prominent and glans so weel exposed that make it much more sexy and attractive. We frequently go to sauna and spa with a young circumcised friend, when we see the other people watch and admire his beautiful cock we are proud to be and have sex with him.

I'm circumcised and have always been circumcised..............I don't know when it was done.  I don't know of a disadvantage, but circumcision has some serious advantages.  The main one is cleanliness; anyone that's been around an uncircumcised penis that hasn't been cleaned for a few days knows what I mean.  Also, the chances of a sexually transmitted disease are reduced by 40% when circumcised.
My Father was uncircumcised and in his later years he was plagued with foreskin issues, especially when he had to use a catheter.  He often said he wished he'd been circumcised as a child.
Circumcision was required for those joining the Marines in WWII, for sanitation reasons, and was customarily done shortly after birth to most boys until the '80s.  About that time the decision to not circumcise became popular, with mothers making the decision in most cases, because it was thought that it traumatized the boy.  Boys circumcised right after birth will have no recollection of the operation and will reap the benefit of dramatically enhanced sanition and STD resistance the rest of their lives.

i have always said that a woman has to be natural, no silicone implants allowed, fake beauty wont last long, same as men, natural uncut foresking should be the norm, i would never allowed anyone to cut my foresking, its there for a reason,

both are nice to see

YES U HAVE A LESS CHANCE OF GETTING AN INFECTION

Maybe is also a question of shape and size.
My woman get the best pleasure with a friend that is circumcised. His penis has a longer shaft and a huge glans, so all the foreskin of my tiny cock can't give same strong stimulation.

I am uncut with a quite short foreskin, so I have the head of my penis very easly out and uncovered. I feel much more confortable and I think it give a clean and better look to males genitals. When naked, I feel more confortable with males shaved and with fully exposed glans. My woman like that too.

I was circumsiced at birth.  Research has show that a circumcised penis does not retain the STD's that a noncircumsiced one.  The viruses and bacteris are not trapped inside if the foreskin is not there.  In the african nations, research has shown that when men are circumsiced, the rate of HIV/AIDS goes down by as much as 50%.

I was not circumcised as a child.  As a young boy, I remember the feeling of pulling the tight foreskin back a little bit over the head, and the sensation it gave.  The foreskin was quite tight, I can remember that when I had a bath it was always difficult to get the skin to retract fully to wash the head properly, and then it was slightly painful to get the skin back over the head to its' natural place.  But it felt nice and gave me an erection each time I forced the skin back, and I would masturbate each time.  Gradually I could get the foreskin back further and further.  Once, when I was in my twenties, I entertained a lady in my flat.  She was wearing a girdle, which she would not take off for vanity reasons, but she wanted sex, and in my naive horny state I obliged.  After finishing, her panties were all bloody, and she thought she must be having her period, but I found that I had torn my foreskin and my dick had bled a lot.  The point about relating this, was that I ended up with a small bit of scar tissue on the side of my foreskin, that would tear open constantly during sex, for the rest of my life.  It would not bleed, but it would be raw and sore.  ..  Asking a doctor about it, I was told that I should have it cut off, that I seemed to have too much foreskin anyway.  There was no way I was going to do this.  I needed all that foreskin, when I got an erection, the skin would retract all the way and I would be long and proud.    ..  Then I became separated.  No sex for many years.  Slowly the foreskin shrank, until I could not retract it at all.  When I tried to slide it back, with lots of lube and stretching, it would tear again and bleed.  Eventually it shrank around the tip until I could not even slide my finger inside.  I had Phimosis..  or foreskin shrinkage.  The doctors simply game me various creams..  none of which worked.  Finally I had no option but to have a surgical procedure called a 'dorsal slit'.   I'll spare you the details of the trauma I went through, feeling like I had been mutilated.  But it finally healed, and now I have a partial helmet on the glans.  It retracts, but rarely stays covered.  I can only cover the sides and the bottom, not the top, which gets suntanned.  Slide the helmet back, and it shows.    ..  From a sensation point of view, keeping the foreskin and peeling it back is very sensuous.  The way it is now, it will slide back by itself while I walk, or just sit around.  I would guess that a circumcised penis head would not have as much sensation as what this gives me.  I am horny most of the time.  ..  The moral of the story is that having had a foreskin, and now having it retracted most of the time, I am glad that I was not circumcised..  I have always found it extremely sensuous to retract the skin and have so much sensation in the glans.  When I slid it back under my pants, it gave me a hardon ..  which, on many occasions, got me into trouble.  But I am of the opinion that it a kid is cut when young, that he likely loses some of this feeling, and thus misses out on a lot of fun.

Well, I am circumcised and believe that I have plenty of sensitivity and sensation in my penis, but I do wonder if being circumcised at a very early age (before 1 year I think) caused my penis to ultimately be smaller. I mean would the average length have been something more as I grew up or does the internal structure of ligaments, blood vessels and other tissues determine its ultimate length? Either way I am not about to go back and change anything no surgically, no way! Ain't nobody performing ANY sort of surgery on my johnson unless they have a fully loaded gun to my head and my family held hostage as well.


Are the alternative surgery styles? What about cutting the bottom of the Foreskin and leaving the top like a raincoat draped over the penis? This would leave extra skin on the top (or front) when the appendage is dangling and we are running naked through the bush (hunting with spears and axes...) and possibly also serve as a little extra baggage during sexual intercourse for stimulation of the self AND partner.

(I guess maybe I am just using a bit of imagination and wondering IF it were possible to do something different, what would it be??...)

I wholeheartedly disagree! I love the look of an uncircumcised penis just as much, if not more, than a circumcised penis...and fellatio with an uncircumcised penis is so much more fun!

I don't understand why one would get circumcised for sexual reasons...can you explain? thanks.

I've been uncircumcised all my life and never lived life any differently. Sex is great, never had health problems down there, and people still say I look good. In the end in doesn't matter whether your cut or uncut, as long as you feel comfortable with bodies. That is what naturism is all about!

I'M CIRCUMCISED AND HAVE BEEN ALL MY LIFE.IF A WOMAN ONLY WANTS ME FOR MY PENIS SHE SHOULDN'T COMPLAIN IF A GUY ONLY WANTS HER FOR HER VAGINA.HOWEVER I'M LOOKING FOR A WOMAN WITH A GREAT PERSONALITY THE VAGINA THAT COMES WITH HER BODY IS JUST A BONUS SHE MAY OR MAY NOT WISH TO SHARE.I HOPE SHE DOESN'T GIVE A DARN WHETHER I'M CIRCUMCISED OR NOT.THAT'S NOT WHAT A SOLID RELATIONSHIP SHOULD BE ABOUT.

BigDave2010 it goes a bit beyond Biblical, tribal people was circumcising without knowing what was written there. circumcision was more than a tribal ritual, I'm sure that they was doing it for the same reason we still do today, health, it's sexual advantages of one being that males that are circumcised can get erections easier and hold them for longer and I'm sure that there are more reasons.

Re: LastOutlaw's question about sensitivity after circumcision. I was Circumsized at 28. I'm 64 now. Believe me, the skin kept me more sensitive. It didn't take 36 years to lose sensitivity. It was lost in a few months.

I quite agree the foreskin does serve a good purpose in stimulating a woman during sexual intercourse. My prefer is an uncircumcised penis. Why remove it. Must be created to perform a purpose?

Yes I am not circumcised and my penis is very sensitive to sexual stimulation.

I still have my foreskin too and I am 47, and I will probably never have it cut off.