Nudist Friends
Home
FREE Sign up
Sign in
Help / Faq
Blog / Forum
Contact us / Jobs
Nudist Blogs > APhotographer's blogs > Profile Photos
Profile Photos Sort by:
Author
aPhotographer
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2
Posted on 12/10/2011

After reading a few blogs & forums on similar topics as this, I have come to notice the photos selected to post in profiles depends on the background of the person/persons doing the posting. Some do not show any pics at all, possibly because their business is dealing with the public or they are in high profile positions & don't wish to be judged. Then there are couples listed but only pics of one person, perhaps the other is wary of posting pics on-line just not comfortable being seen by strangers, an at home naturist, only with family & a select few friends. There are a very few families who post pics that show various members family enjoying this lifestyle ( including minors ). Seems fairly well accepted in various situations & media to see the female figure fully nude in many public places. This seems the only type place where males are equally accepted. No wonder many males flaunt their appendage as freely as women do with their entire body's. However, it is also noted that erections are not necessary for pics , unless one is actually advertising in hopes of luring more than friends or possibly meaningful relationships.
As for pics done indoors or out, not everyone can travel or even have the freedom to enjoy one's own property outdoors. Sad to say, I am one of those. Though I have frequented beaches in the past, I didn't have a camera with me then. Now that I have a camera, I don't travel, nearest beach is 2 hours away. My property is not secluded & can be seen from many vantage points, both front & back yards. Unfortunately, my pics are now limited to mostly indoors. I once posted pics of my children when they were much younger. The censors deemed the pics unsuitable & had them deleted from profile. Because it is very rare, I am very happy to see others have their childrens pics posted. I congratulate them on getting them accepted. Wish we could all post pics of all our family members. Maybe someday...


Available only
to logged in members

Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
aPhotographer
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 2
Posted on 05/09/2012

Thank you for pointing out the error i made in your quote, I have corrected my statement to include the 'NOT'.  I have posted a pic of myself as well. If you would rather see more of me & less of my family, I can do that as well. If you have any other requests, just ask, i'll be happy to accomodate.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
brianp1553
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1855
Posted on 05/06/2012

Where dis 'aphotographer' get the idea that
 'However, it is also noted that erections are necessary for pics , unless one is actually advertising in hopes of luring more than friends or possibly meaningful relationships'.
He seems to have the idea that pics of children even his own were accepable as well. Then there was considerable doubt as to the souces (Copyright breaches?) of many of the pictures that he has used,



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
nakedandyclair
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 63
Posted on 12/17/2011

And then there are people, like the author of this blog for example, who simply publish pictures of other people that have been taken from other sites etc! None of themselves!!



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
brianp1553
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1855
Posted on 12/14/2011

Our local Radio station here in Norfolk UK, has just reported that another 'peodo' has been caught and sentenced for 'Grooming' children and having indecent images of children on his computer. Apart from the prison sentence, he will be put on the Sex Offenders Register for life.

We wonder what gets them started at having such a fascination with children and their 'bits'.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
brianp1553
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1855
Posted on 12/13/2011

Donlooking,
It seems that judgements about pics have been made, such as the decision made by the old established Naturist magazine H & E to not have any of children is in part the 'easy' decision, by having none, then they avoid challenges as to artistic or other merit. Taking the other end of the view, Porn pics of children are graded 1 (least) to 5 (most) and when a case goes to court, the allegations are graded to each of these numbers. It would seem that there is a thriving 'trade' in pictures generally via the internet. The people involved are often not just collectors but are actually involved in 'Kiddy Fiddling' as well. Once they are found, the sentences are rigourous and of course they end up on the sex offenders register in the U.K. Our area of rural Norfolk, Cambs and Lincs seems to have a full quota of both.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
Donlooking Recommended
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1
Posted on 12/12/2011

I must agree about if you work in a public postion and all but then again if you are here looking at say the pics well how could you pass judgement if someone sees your pics on here???   I mean if they see you here well then aren't they nudist or interested in it??? So I do agree that it could be a hot topic if you let it be there brian..  
I do agree that the idea of young pics is all in the eye of the beholder weather it is just nudism  or is more?? I believe that there is a "which hunt" in that some people are not really looking to judge if it is art or something more sinster...  I believe that it is all in the eye of the beholder and unfortuntly we are "throwing out the artistic side" with the more sinister side as we believe or have been lead to believe that any pic of younger of any kind is BAD!!!!!!!!!!!! And I disagree....
 



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
gentelman51
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 19
Posted on 12/12/2011

Thanks for your blog, it is well written and appreciated.

My photos are very recent and posted to show my interest in being free to enjoy a non clothing enviornment. However,my issue is lack of a private place to take out door photos. So, hence except for one, I am fully clothed. I hope to visit a nude resort this summer and add more pics. I also hope to make some friends there and have outdoor fun times in the sun. Those that have never sun bathed nude have no idea how super it feels...I love it!
Please have a great day and thanks again for your pics & blog!



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share
brianp1553
Available only
to logged in members

total posts: 1855
Posted on 12/11/2011

Nude Photographs are a 'Hot Subject', both because they might affect your job if you work in a Public position like say teaching or lecturing, also because all too often, pictures are swapped, traded and passed round without the knowledge or permission of the persons who have been photographed. As for pictures of children, regardless of how innocent 'family pictures' might or might not be, with programs like say Photoshop, they came be altered in many ways even to include sexual activities. H & E the UK naturist magazine that has been published since about 1900 STOPPED having 'family' photographs in its monthly mag in the late 1980's because of this. Now it is just couples and single adults.

Aphotographers previous bloggs about removing the doors within his home as well as him using his camera, is sufficient to make people wary.



Reply / add comments   Quote   Report abuse    0 up Bookmark and Share


Privacy policy | Success stories | Partners | Dating advice & safety tips | Build your Nudist dating site / Affiliate
Copyright © 2001 — 2012 NudistFriends.com (Powered by SuccessfulMatch). All rights reserved.